User blog comment:BeoBlade/Things all new users should know/@comment-14812118-20160205131459/@comment-14812118-20160205180630

1. It's common sense, man. Patch or not, it's still common sense. Otherwise, should we let the user we just banned to enter the chat with no problem? I mean, there's probably a reason he/she got banned.

2. I don't particularly like the idea, but let's be honest here: how much anon edits were helpful? 10% of them, and I'm being generous. If it were up to me, I'd re-enable anons, but we haven't really lost that much.

3. It's a patch rule, yes, but it's essentially right, it's expected of normal people to shut it when they know they are offending other people. It amounts to saying "Don't go around screwing with people repeatedly, or you'll be punished". Whether the offender is acting badly intentionally or not, people don't like to be repeatedly pissed off.

4. I cannot understand your point, honestly. Yeah, it's also an obvious patch rule, but let's be honest: we can't just affiliate with a Wikia when the affiliation is performed without consulting and obtaining consent of the admins, or at least whoever is around.

Also, every single time I connect to the Wiki via PC, the Chat is either empty or full of AFK people. I might have to search for the right time, but it's disheartening, to say the least.